When
I first started reading Dark Tide an interesting line in the book stuck
with me while I kept reading. In the author's note Stephen Puleo wrote "To
understand the flood is to understand America of the early twentieth
century." I feel like this can also be said to understand many national or
international incidents that happen, the history can show many factors and
reasons.
I was
trying to think about another disaster while I was reading "Dark
Tide" and I began to find similarities in the Boston Marathon bombing. In
comparing the Boston Molasses Flood of 1919 to the Boston Marathon Bombing of
2013, I can easily say that the location was similar. During the time of the
flood World War I was going on in Europe which caused controversies. The war in
the Middle East is still going on, and was during the time of the Boston
Marathon bombing. In both events there are people to blame; obviously the
bombers are to blame in the bombings. In the flood you can put some of the
blame on Mr. Jell, but also on the people of the North End who kept quiet.
Throughout
the Boston Marathon bombing many people focused on the first reactors and how immensely
they helped without thinking. In the Molasses flood many people first ran like
many people at the Boston Marathon did, but there were still many people who ran to
help. In both dangerous incidents the danger did not scare some people. These
people made a difference
In
the Great Boston Molasses Flood there were twenty one people killed and 150
people injured. In the Marathon bombing three people were killed and 264 people
were injured. These numbers were different, but they were also not a huge
number of casualties compared to other national or international incidents. For
the most part these events were unexpected. The bombings were a complete
surprise. The flood was unexpected because they did not know when the tank was
going to bust, but they knew it eventually would. In both incidents innocent
people were injured or killed, and a city was ruined. The damage was physical
and emotional. For both incidents the aftermath was similar. There were family
members and friends that had the terrifying feeling of not knowing the outcome.
There were
different things too. The places were different, although very close. Also the
time was almost one hundred years different. The flood was a more natural incident;
it could almost be called an accident. In contrast the bombings were not an
accident and there was a motive to the bombers. There were also many other aspects to the incidents that were different. I was not
sure if I wanted to compare the flood to the bombings, because it is still a
hard topic to discuss for some people, but that was also true for many people
at the time of the molasses flood.
No comments:
Post a Comment